During a recent CNN interview, Republican Senator John Curtis of Utah addressed President Donald Trump's comments regarding Somali immigrants, where Trump stated, "We don’t want ’em in our country" and suggested they should "let ’em go back to where they came from." Curtis did not directly condemn these remarks, instead emphasizing the importance of individual actions in creating a welcoming atmosphere for immigrants. He encouraged Americans to reflect on their daily contributions to this goal, implying that such personal efforts could mitigate the impact of negative statements from influential figures.

Curtis acknowledged that voters were aware of Trump's disruptive approach when they elected him, suggesting that this disruption was a response to widespread discomfort with existing policies. He characterized this disruption as necessary, despite its potential for causing distress.

Critics, including CNN's Dana Bash, pointed out that Trump's position as president amplifies the significance of his comments, which can have harmful implications for entire communities. Curtis's reluctance to confront Trump's rhetoric raises questions about the responsibility of elected officials to challenge xenophobic sentiments, particularly in a political climate where such views can lead to increased hostility towards immigrant populations.