The article examines an incident involving Grammarly, an editing software developed by Ukrainian entrepreneurs, which prompted a user to support Ukraine while they were writing a column that questioned Ukraine's actions regarding the Nord Stream pipelines. The user expressed support for Ukraine in the context of the ongoing conflict with Russia but criticized the appropriateness of corporate entities like Grammarly inserting political messages into their services.

The user noted that while they recognize the war as an unjust aggression by Russia against Ukraine, they believe individuals should form their own opinions without corporate influence. The article highlights a recent German court warrant that implicates Ukraine in the Nord Stream incident, suggesting a complex narrative involving both Ukraine and Russia, with accusations of false flag operations directed at both parties.

Grammarly, valued at $13 billion, was developed by Alex Shevchenko, Max Lytvyn, and Dmytro Lider. The user raised several inquiries to Grammarly, including whether the software recognizes the subject matter of users' writing before inserting political prompts, if the company supports other political causes, and whether it operates in Russia. The user expressed discomfort with the idea of receiving political guidance from a grammar-checking tool, emphasizing the need for such tools to focus on their primary function rather than engage in political advocacy.

The article concludes with the user reiterating their preference for Grammarly to concentrate on grammar and spelling rather than political messaging, reflecting a broader concern about the intersection of corporate influence and personal expression in the digital age.