On November 11, 2025, the Indiana Senate voted 31-11 against House Bill 1032, which proposed redrawing the state's congressional districts to potentially secure additional seats for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. This decision came after months of pressure from President Trump, who publicly criticized Indiana lawmakers opposing the redistricting efforts, suggesting they should be removed from office.

The bill's failure highlights a notable division within the Republican Party, as more Republicans (21) voted against the bill than in favor (19), alongside unanimous opposition from the 10 Senate Democrats. The proposal aimed to gerrymander Indiana's districts, which would have displaced the state's two Democratic representatives. Despite the Indiana House's prior approval of the bill, Senate President Pro Tempore Rod Bray indicated that there were insufficient votes to support the redistricting effort.

The atmosphere surrounding the redistricting discussions has been marked by intimidation, with reports of threats against lawmakers, including bomb threats and swatting incidents. This climate of fear is unprecedented in Indiana's political history, according to legislators from both parties. Protests occurred outside the Senate chamber, where constituents voiced their demands for fair representation, emphasizing the importance of public engagement in the legislative process.

Republican state Senator Spencer Deery articulated his opposition to mid-cycle gerrymandering, asserting that his stance aligns with conservative principles and a commitment to resisting federal overreach. Democrats argued that the proposed changes would undermine the voting power of minority communities, further complicating the debate over representation and equity in voting.

The outcome of this vote means that the redistricting proposal cannot be reconsidered until after the regular legislative session concludes in March 2026. This situation reflects broader tensions within the Republican Party regarding electoral strategies and the implications of aggressive political tactics on democratic processes. As the political landscape evolves, both sides are preparing for potential legal challenges and further political maneuvering.