David Hogg, an activist and organizer, articulated his vision for the future of the Democratic Party during an interview at The Big Interview event in San Francisco. He expressed concern that establishment candidates may not fully grasp the potential consequences they face in upcoming elections, particularly in 2026 and 2028. Hogg suggested that the current leadership, exemplified by figures like Chuck Schumer, may be disconnected from the sentiments of younger voters and the broader electorate.

Hogg noted that significant protests, such as the No Kings Day demonstrations, are largely driven by older generations, indicating a growing dissatisfaction with established leaders. He criticized the current composition of Congress, likening it to the decline of the Soviet Union due to the age and perceived detachment of its leaders. Hogg, who previously served as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, emphasized the need for a generational shift in political representation.

Through his organization, Leaders We Deserve, Hogg aims to support candidates who prioritize integrity and do not accept corporate funding. He highlighted the desire among young voters for candidates who are seen as outsiders and who can articulate a clear vision for the future, rather than merely positioning themselves as a lesser evil compared to Republicans.

Hogg also expressed frustration with the reluctance of establishment Democrats to face primary challenges, citing an incident where moderate Congressman Steve Cohen reacted negatively to a primary challenge from a more progressive candidate. He argued that elected positions should be viewed as belonging to the voters rather than the incumbents.

Looking ahead, Hogg hopes for a competitive primary process for the next Democratic presidential candidate, advocating for a system that encourages diverse and representative voices. He acknowledged the risks associated with his activism, including threats to his safety, but remains committed to ensuring that future candidates can effectively represent the interests of their constituents without being beholden to special interests.